UF and concentration

Microplastics and UF: retention and measurement

Assess microplastic retention by UF with defined sizes, polymers, sampling and blanks. Distinguish particle counts, polymer mass and unmeasured nanoplastics.

Published Updated

Define the analytical target before testing

Agree the polymers, particle sizes, fibre categories and reporting units before the trial. Particles per litre and polymer mass per litre measure different quantities. A method counting one size range says nothing definitive about fractions below its detection capability, even when a report describes the result as not detected.

The European drinking-water methodology and JRC report explain these analytical distinctions. Their scope does not make every industrial sample suitable for the same procedure without adaptation. Ask the laboratory how it will address organic and solids interference and demonstrate recovery in the actual water matrix.

Relate size to a verified physical barrier

Nominal pore size helps select a membrane but does not verify the complete assembly. Leaks, seals, damaged fibres and downstream contamination can change the outcome. Retention must also be interpreted against fibre and fragment dimensions and shape rather than an assumption that all particles are ideal spheres.

Avoid stating that conventional UF retains all nanoplastics. Where very small fractions matter, define how they will be measured and which treatment barrier should be evaluated. Successful separation of particles identifiable by microscopy does not independently establish behaviour below the analytical method’s size range.

Design sampling and contamination blanks

Agree containers, materials and handling with the laboratory to minimise external plastic and fibre contamination. Include field and procedure blanks where appropriate. Measure sampled volume and record dates, process conditions and equipment state. Paired samples must describe the same feed episode and operating campaign.

Choose sample volume according to expected concentration and the applicable method’s quantification limit rather than convenience. Compare corrected results with their uncertainty. If feed is below quantification, two not-detected results do not support a precise percentage-removal calculation or a claim of zero particles.

Account for retained particles and their destination

Separation transfers material into backwash water, bleed or retentate; it does not demonstrate destruction. Include these streams in the balance and define their subsequent management. Where backwash is recycled, investigate accumulation and possible reintroduction into the process or sampling location.

Agree acceptance through filtrate quality, integrity and a reproducible analytical campaign. For an industrial quotation, provide composition, solids, flow and the target size range. Separate an exploratory investigation from a contractual guarantee, which needs explicit conditions, method, uncertainty and an agreed response to non-compliance.

Common questions

Does not detected mean zero microplastics?

No. It means the method did not quantify its defined target in that sample within its limits and conditions.

Can mass be compared with particles per litre?

Not directly. Composition, dimensions and shape would be needed; the two metrics are not interchangeable.

Sources and documentation

Your project with Neptuno

Get a proposal for your project.

Tell us what you need to solve and which water you treat. Start with the information you have.

We will review the application and explain the solution we can supply or the information needed to assess it.

Contactcomercial@neptunoes.comEmail water analyses, photographs and drawings to our sales address.
TECHNICAL CONTACT

Tell us about your project.

Tell us what you need and we’ll propose a solution.

Add process details (optional)

We will use your details to handle your enquiry.